Soo Jin Hou contributed this article to Nextinsight

In Dec last year, 2 weeks after I wrote about CW Group (HKEX: 1322), it went into trading halt for a week before trading is resumed with the announcement of a very significant acquisition. See: 

The acquisition target is Zuse Hüller-Hille, a German machine tool manufacturer, and it comes with a profit guarantee of EUR 11.5m for the year ending 31/12/18. The profit guarantee is almost half of what CW reported for year ending 31/12/16 which is the equivalent profit of EUR 24.2m.

Stock price 


52-week range

HK$1.07 – $1.97



Market cap

HK$906 m

Shares outstanding

719 m



1-year return


Source: Bloomberg

Upon resumption of trading, the market took the news well, and the share price soared to an intra-day high of HKD 1.76 before closing at HKD 1.48. 

However, over the next few weeks, interest fizzled out and inexplicably on 7/2/18, it saw intense selling pressure during the last 10 minutes of trading which drove the share price down to a historical low of HKD 1.07. Strangely, the seller (or sellers) disappeared as quickly as they came, and they were nowhere to be seen on the next trading day.

Readers should note that the stock is not shortable. Also, CW's investor relations staff responded to my query, saying that the Company is not aware of any material event that caused the sell-off and we have not dealt with the securities of the Company.” 

Since that day, share price has languished below pre-announcement levels.

Zuse Hüller-Hille

According to the CW announcement, the brand Zuse Hüller-Hille “has a long operating history in the machine tools industry and can be traced back to 1923, when it was founded by Dr. Karl Hüller in Germany. It focuses on the development and manufacture of premium quality machine tools with a product portfolio which includes horizontal 4 and 5-axis machining centers, as well as the vertical center NBV 700 in modular design.

That statement is misleading because Zuse Automation was only founded in 2016 by the current CEO Ralph Christnacht. Hüller-Hille is the brand with a long history and it was acquired by Zuse in May 2017 from Fair Friend Group and combined with Zuse Automation. Why is Ralph Christnarcht so important that CW deemed it fit to emphasize that Mr Christnacht will continue to lead for at least 3 years after the acquisition?

Mr Christnacht is no lightweight in the machine tool business. He was the CEO of DMG Mori AG from Aug 2013 to Dec 2015. DMG Mori AG is the German subsidiary of DMG Mori, one of the largest machine tool manufacturer in the world.

CW has until 31/9/18 to complete their due diligence, but it is almost certain that this deal will go through. That’s because CW and Zuse have a working relationship since at least 26/8/16, where both parties signed a MOU to secure turnkey automotive and precision engineering projects in Germany. Apparently, that relationship worked out well, because in an interview in June 2017, Mr Christnacht called CW Group his longtime business partner. The interview can be found here.

The same paragraph sheds much light on why CW’s growth has slowed since 2015, and the Google translated version says: “CW has represented many brands in Southeast Asia over the past few years. Due to the change in the strategy of the producers to direct sales, they suddenly had no more products to sell. Two years ago, they approached me and said they need a German machine tool brand to do something themselves. My idea was that we would need a good brand name.”

It is quite clear from CW’s disclosures that they act as consultant to their customers and distributor on behalf of other brands. Their manufacturing capability is not extensive because the value of plant and equipment in their book is merely HKD 8.2m. This acquisition, if successful, will likely be a game changer for them because they will be acquiring manufacturing capability through Zuse Hüller-Hille’s manufacturing plant in Mosbach, Germany.

ZuseZuse Hüller-Hille’s manufacturing plant in Mosbach

A potential proxy to Asian aerospace?

Zuse Hüller-Hille took part in EMO (Exposition Mondiale de la Machine-Outil) 2017 in Hanover. EMO is an European trade show for the manufacturing industries. In the company blog ( ), the company showcased its capability in manufacturing the casing of an aircraft engine.

Watch video of the exhibition -->

For keen readers of Singaporean and Malaysian business news, the exhibit should stir some excitement because aerospace is a sector both governments are trying to stimulate. Singapore is particularly successful in attracting aerospace majors to its Seletar Aerospace Park. At the same time, many aerospace majors are moving closer to where their customers are, notably China and South East Asia.

There are two companies in Malaysia that manufacture engine casing -- SAM, which supplies to GE Aviation and Pratt And Whitney; and UMW, which supplies to Rolls Royce. It is not easy to make these parts. UMW, in particular, spent RM750m over a span of 2 years to build a dedicated facility. It is challenging to manufacture these parts because 1) they are large and very precise and 2) titanium/titanium alloy are hard to machine.

Aerospace is a discipline requiring a high degree of precision. Unlike other engineering disciplines, over designing is not a virtue, but a vice because it results in unnecessary weight, weight that costs airlines money through fuel burnt over the 20 years or so of service life to haul the extra weight. As a result of that, aircrafts are designed to perform within a narrow band, and hence the high degree of precision.

Among others, the engine/casing is one of the most precise parts of an aircraft. The efficiency of the engine/turbine is a function of the clearance between the tip of the blade and the casing. The ability to machine the casing to a very high precision enables this clearance to be minimized. If titanium alloy is chosen, it compounds the difficulty in achieving the needed precision.

The point about the discussion on engine casing is to differentiate Zuse Hüller-Hille from other machine tool makers. I believe they serve the premium, high tech market. I do not think they are big, because in the acquisition announcement, it is revealed that their order book is just EUR 40m for 2018. To compensate for size, they need to carve a niche for themselves and I believe they are quite capable of doing so.

In the interview with Mr Christnarcht, he talked about a NBH 5000 that is used to machine aerospace titanium structural parts. Somehow, this tool cannot be found on their website. After some digging, I’ve managed to find it in their aerospace specific brochure through the company blog: The NBH 5000 looks like this and it is indeed a monster:

Zuse nbh5000

I have also noted 2 other evidences of CW’s link to aerospace in my first article:

  1. CW had placed out 15% of its share capital to Shenzhen Hua Hang Xin Investment Center Limited Partnership, an investment vehicle linked to AVIC (or Aviation Industry Corporation of China),
  2. iFast’s bond review report “Are CW Group’s New 7% 3Y Bonds Attractive?” revealed that CW serves well known aerospace companies such as Rolls-Royce, Honeywell and Hamilton Sundstrand.

Valuation of the acquisition

The acquisition of Zuse Hüller-Hille comes with a profit guarantee of EUR 11.5m. If that target is met, CW will shell out EUR 126.5m for the acquisition. That works out to be PE of 11. Unfortunately, there is no information on the balance sheet of the target, therefore a more sophisticated peer comparison cannot be carried out.

Share price

PE (ttm)

Annualised PE latest report

Revenue (ttm)



Zuse Hüller-Hille



JPY 1,457



HKD3.9 b

HKD 5.5 b



JPY 1,090




HKD 9.1 b


DMG Mori

JPY 2,140




HKD 36.7b


CW Group

HKD 1.25



HKD2.5 b

HKD 1.3 b


# Market cap and EV for Tsugami, Makino and DMG Mori is converted from JPY to HKD for comparison.

* Excludes gain on repurchase of note HKD 7.7m and forex gain HKD 15.4m.

When compared to 3 machine tool manufacturers listed in Japan, the acquisition does not appear to be expensive. CW Group looks dirt cheap, although its revenue is smaller.

The acquisition price of EUR 126.5m is equivalent to HKD 1.2b, which is higher than CW’s market cap at HKD 899m. This prompted a few comments about 蛇吞象, literally "snake eat elephant", or biting off more than it can chew. I believe this is a fallacy because a close examination of CW’s balance sheet indicates that they have the financial muscle to carry out the acquisition.

On 30/6/17, it has:

Escrow fund

HKD 336,402,000

Trade receivables

HKD 2,269,740,000


HKD 143,011,000


Trade payables

HKD 981,971,000


HKD 542,641,000


HKD 1,224,541

Of course, CW cannot deplete its working capital entirely for the acquisition, but considering its net gearing is only 0.22, there is still headroom to gear up. The acquisition appears unusually big because CW is trading at distressed valuations of 0.48 price to book and 3.7 trailing PE. If they are to trade at a valuation typical of machine tool makers shown in the table above, it would not attract such skepticism.

CW has indicated they have sufficient funds to meet the payment for tranche 1, representing 60% of the target company, but may need to tap borrowings or equity raising to meet tranche 2 for the remaining 40% of the target company. So, investors should be prepared for a rights issue should management find it necessary to call for one.


SooJinHou8.17Soo Jin HouThe way I see it, this acquisition is a game changer for CW Group. By having manufacturing capability and their own brand, they should be able to grow their business further than relying on other brands. However, this acquisition comes with 2 major risks.

The target company is not exactly Zuse Hüller-Hille, but its parent Brownstone Investments Limited. Because Zuse Hüller-Hille has only been injected into the target company in the mid-2017, there is no financial record for reference. Also, the previous owner of Hüller-Hille, Fair Friend Group is a private company and therefore no publicly available financial record is available. The only number available, unfortunately, is the profit guarantee, which may or may not materialize.

The second risk is potentially crippling, because we have seen it happened to Karex and possibly IQ Group. Both companies are contract manufacturers, one for condoms, another for LED products, who then embarked on developing their own brands. Both suffered top and bottom line decline after going solo, which suggest their customers withdrawing business on perceived threat from a future competitor. The same can happen to CW. However, unlike Karex and IQ Group, they are acquiring a well established brand, rather than building one from scratch. That alleviate the risk somewhat.

Choo Chi Fei, Nicholas Oh and Kok Li Ong contributed to this article.


0 #1 Will Ng 2018-06-24 15:11
Hi, CW just defaulted on their 7% CW ATD bond ?? Do u think it is because they have used up their liquidity to do this acquistion ? Will acquistion go through ? Or CW is doomed ?

Share Prices

Counter NameLastChange
AEM Holdings1.190-0.030
Alliance Mineral0.1790.001
Anchor Resources0.0210.001
Avi-Tech Electronics0.285-
Best World Int.2.390-0.030
China Sunsine1.150-0.030
CSE Global0.5450.005
Food Empire0.5650.005
Geo Energy0.182-
Golden Energy0.2350.005
GSS Energy0.1010.002
ISDN Holdings0.240-
KSH Holdings0.505-0.005
Moya Asia0.077-
Nordic Group0.325-
Oxley Holdings0.310-0.005
REX International0.0770.001
Sing Holdings0.3900.005
Sino Grandness0.058-0.003
Straco Corp.0.780-0.010
Sunningdale Tech1.350-
Sunpower Group0.5750.005
The Trendlines0.0870.001
Tiong Seng0.2400.005
Uni-Asia Group1.220-
XMH Holdings0.200-
Yangzijiang Shipbldg1.500-

NextInsight RSS

rss_2 NextInsight - Latest News

Online Now

We have 1027 guests and no members online